So, magazines, right? I mean, some people are way into them, and other people consider nearly every one on the newsstands to be pure garbage. Let’s cut to the chase- I love them. Not all of them, and not all of them equally, but for those that I do love, I am fiercely loyal. And I specifically love print magazines. None of this newfangled download-it-to-your-iPad nonsense. No. No way. It’s the freshly-pressed pages of a glossy in your hands, or nothing. Of course, I do blogs, and while I understand that those are frequently referred to as “online magazines”, you’re kept at the nice pace of about one or two new articles a day . A blog doesn’t bombard you with hundreds of pages per month, complete with ads, with the expectation that you click or scroll through all of them on a screen, in one sitting. No, that kind of reading commitment is saved for the glossies, as it should be.
So which ones do I read? Well, a lot. I’ve only subscribed to a couple in my lifetime because I’ve found subscription services to be somewhat untrustworthy, but boy let me tell you that buying mags off the stands is a real money pit, especially when you buy multiple titles every month like me. But that’s just the price you pay (literally) for the fun. And I will say that for about one week each month, I go into a sort of frenzy trying to uncover the coming month’s cover stars, and I then go on a week-long hunt trying to locate each beloved mag as soon as possible (and here’s a pro tip: Wal-Mart is the first to get the newest issues, usually about two days before they’re scheduled to “hit the stands”). And once I’ve obtained all my desired issues for the month, I’ll admit that I go through a sort of let-down phase for a couple days where I cope with the reality that there won’t be any new magazines for at least three weeks. A whole three weeks. Yes, it’s that bad, and yes, it makes time fly super fast (because think about it, when you’re holding the March issue in your hands on February 13th, YOU’RE BASICALLY LIVING IN THE FUTURE).
So which ones do I read? Oh wait, that was the question I meant to answer in the last paragraph. Welp.
More than just these pictured here.
But let me provide you with a brief (sure, uh huh) discussion of the magazines that I’ve interacted with in my short lifetime. I haven’t dealt with 100% of the ones you see on newsstands (for instance, hipster mags such as Foam and Vice remain a relatively untouched territory for me … can’t deal with the heavily-filtered pretentiousness … and YES, I judge them as pretentious).
Marie Claire: This magazine is for the Power Woman. It encourages and assumes workplace success, frequently discusses the advancements, plights, and contributions of women around the world, and seems most fit for the “independent woman”. I absolutely adore the publication’s fashion and beauty features, but Marie Claire can also be quite politically charged and favors discussion of hot-button social issues. When I read magazines, I honestly don’t have much interest in this type of subject matter. I mean this not in the sense that I prefer to remain ignorant (which my friends and family hardly allow me), but it’s simply not relaxing or entertaining for me personally. I will also be honest and say that the writers often assume a consistent political point of view, and if you don’t find yourself in the same frame of mind it can feel a bit like the journalist’s equivalent of “You can’t sit with us!“. But that’s life, and at least the content seeks to be informative and educational. I can hardly resist the magazine’s beauty sections, anyhow. I have a strange affinity for beauty product still-life shots, and Marie Claire always seems to have some of the best. So, sometimes I pick a copy of MC, and sometimes I don’t. But either way, it’s pretty quality.
Lucky: You might recall a very old post of mine in which I veritably bashed Lucky magazine a year-and-a-half ago. I had become extremely frustrated with the publication for its awkward attempts at being relatable, its trend-slave taste (do beware that this magazine is about shopping and really nothing else), and its drone-like tone as it insisted that flash-in-the-pan items like gold lame’ jeans are an “OMG MUST HAVE”. I’d also been unimpressed with its inability to stay on the cutting edge with its covers, which had become sort of predictable and boring, and lacking in anything that really set them apart.
However, the replacement of Brandon Holley with Eva Chen as the new EIC this past September has brought a sort of uptick in the quality of Lucky. Chen (with the formidable Anna Wintour right by her side as the Conde Nast creative director) has overseen a new batch of better styled and more luxe-looking covers with photographers like Patrick Demarchelier, a more aspirational price range (read: higher prices means a richer, more desirable feel for the magazine), and a little more substance over just plain salesmanship in content. I will admit that Kerry Washington’s December cover had to be one of the worst cover shots I’ve ever seen (it seriously does the Scandal beauty absolutely no justice), but I will admit that I’ve seen large improvements in Lucky since Chen has taken the helm. Lucky is still all about shopping, still draws heavily on a street style aesthetic (so if you do the street fashion thing on Pinterest, it’s totally your gig), and it still sometimes feels like it’s talking a little too much more than showing, but I have to admit that I’ve purchased nearly every issue since this past September. I give this one a thumbs-up and say it’s now worth a try.
Allure: I love Allure. I love love love love Allure. I actually subscribed to this magazine in high school, clearly demonstrating the beauty department to be my first love. The entire magazine is dedicated to all things beauty, which is seriously my dream. Whole articles are dedicated to discussing and illustrating breakthroughs in hair mousse, “romantic makeup”, the latest trends in braids, how to find the really quality stuff at a drugstore, the best Oscar hair-do’s of the past ten years, false lashes, or the newest research in sunscreen and skin protection. Whole articles for this stuff! And don’t even get me started on their annual “Best of Beauty” issue … I just gobble that stuff right up. There are little bits of fashion features sprinkled throughout so you get just enough of that, but give me a four- or five-page feature on eyeliner, and I’m good for life.
The one downside to Allure is its focus on the aspects of the beauty department that are sometimes not as interesting, such as lasers, peels, and the latest procedures beneath the knife. There’s a lot of plastic surgery and weight loss discussion, and with all the talk about the procedures that can lead us to supposed “perfection”, it can sometimes feel awkward and disingenuous when reading the article on how to play up your own “unique” features on the very next page. I’ve had no problem just tearing out pages I don’t want to read, though. Aside from the some of the bodycentric stuff, Allure‘s a keeper.
Vogue: Let me confess that I’ve purchased maybe three issues of Vogue in my lifetime. It’s honestly just beyond my realm of living. Oh sure, there’s fashion aplenty, but its also a lifestyle magazine with the the assumption that you’re part of a privileged crowd with the ways and means of living the life that’s discussed in Vogue. There’s discussion of high society, politics, the arts, the media, and all kinds of other perfectly good things, but I just don’t feel at home reading Vogue. And with my budget, I don’t think I’m meant to, either. And that’s okay! I’ll read it for the celebrity cover stories and glorious fashion spreads (which can be done in the grocery line), but I tend to leave the rest. However, it is still maintains its eternal reputation (and in spite of anything I have to say) as “the fashion bible”. Vogue remains queen, and though I don’t have much interaction with her, I respect her.
Elle: I occasionally pick up a copy of this magazine depending on how meaty the beauty section looks, but I’ve always sort of felt like Elle was the younger, sexier sister of the older, more sophisticated Vogue (though they’re in competition with one another). The brand itself is huge globally, with around 40 international editions in over 60 countries and it supposedly being the world’s “biggest” fashion publication (probably meaning it has the most editions around the world compared to any other). This publication has had some of my favorite cover shots ever, and that alone has at times been enough to convince me to purchase an issue. Elle is a lifestyle magazine, so it will speak into many areas, like Vogue, including politics, the arts, and entertainment along with a primary focus on fashion. I like Elle a lot, but I think it’s also just a bit overwhelming for me. I just find myself sorting through so many other sections until I get to the fashion and beauty that it’s just a sad waste of paper to purchase more than about three issues a year, personally.
Harper’s Bazaar: If you’re looking for a quality education in the world of high fashion without all the extra lifestyle features of Vogue or Elle, Harper’s Bazaar should serve you well. In my opinion, it’s for the die-hards who just want to talk about the clothes and the shows. Of course, it can feel a bit highbrow, but I feel the publication does such a good job at just showcasing as much clothing and design as possible that I rarely feel overwhelmed or annoyed by any highfalutin discussion of the who’s-who on the Upper East Side. Harper’s Bazaar has truly been my guide to the trenches of the fashion world. It’s been my textbook for names, history, superior trend forecasting, and the collections of the season. If you’re truly passionate about the world of fashion with a desire to understand every cog in the machine, I recommend Bazaar for you.
People StyleWatch: Consider this the junk food of fashion publications, the anti-Vogue, and I mean that in the best way possible. People StyleWatch is delicious, it serves its purpose quickly, and it doesn’t bother with heavy text. It’s like fashion training wheels, and it’s for anyone who’s ever cried JUST TELL ME WHAT TO WEAR, WHERE TO BUY IT, AND HOW MUCH IT’LL COST. This magazine’s concept is seriously that simple. It’s almost entirely based on celebrity style, and often demonstrates how to replicate a star’s expensive look for a fraction of the cost, down to the very accessories on their hands. I’ve been a faithful reader of this publication since 2006, and it’s honestly just good clean fun. I’ll admit that it can inspire quite the frantic shopping spree (and seriously, do be careful if you have spending issues because this magazine lists the price and location of every item featured on its pages, making it very addictive), but there’s no condescending advice, there’s an extremely generous budget range (like, the $50-and-under crowd are highly welcome here), and it showcases nothing but pictures, pictures, pictures. My passion for clothing came to life with this magazine, and I have it to thank for starting me down a path toward my own, personal style.
Glamour/Cosmopolitan: Really not a fan. Like, really not. Any magazine that focuses so heavy-handedly on “how to tell if he’s really into you” or “100 Sex moves that will send him into the stratosphere” deserves a minuscule amount of attention. Oh, you say there really isn’t that much sex and relationship content in these magazines as it may appear on the cover? THEN STOP SPLASHING IT ALL OVER YOUR COVERS AS THE NUMBER ONE HEADLINE. I’ll also be honest and say that a lot of the “advice” given in such features can be fairly objectifying of women (which is just so funny considering we’re the ones reading it), ridiculously repetitive, and horribly misleading and inaccurate. But seriously, no truly insightful advice on such important things as your friendships and relationships is to be gained from one page of a magazine with some photoshopped version of Miley Cyrus on the cover (and yes, I’ll backpedal and state that all magazines are guilty of digitally retouching their covers). I mean it! Now, the fashion and beauty features in these publications can be fun, I’m sure. But why not just pick up a magazine devoted entirely to those things and bypass the “Impress your dude” junk completely?
InStyle: If I could only recommend one fashion publication to all women of any age, size, or income, this would be it. InStyle is my favorite magazine. If you enjoy fawning over the latest gorgeous dress worn by Cate Blanchett, this is for you. If you want to know the best kinds of shapewear for your own size, this is for you. If you aren’t sure how to incorporate more exciting color into your wardrobe or in makeup, this is for you. If you like keeping up on the latest runway shows, this is for you. There is nothing discussed in the magazine other than fashion, beauty, personal style, and a bit of home decor with a couple recipes thrown in. I find it to be the most universally appealing publication of any that I’ve mentioned above. There’s no specific income or social bracket targeted (so you’ll see both budget and luxe pieces featured all over), and InStyle seems to stick to the philosophy that style is something that anyone can have, develop, and enjoy, without trying to hold your hand too much.
This magazine is helpful. There are so many features dedicated to showing you exactly how to find, wear, or try something new that you find yourself interacting with the issue on top of just reading it. InStyle has inspired me to take action with my own style countless times, and I can’t name how many different beauty tricks or trends I’ve tried because of it (i.e. orange lips, victory rolls, an at-home blowout, the “wet” look, you name it!). If you go for just one fashion publication, choose this one. And I’ll also mention that I’ve been a subscriber for over three years and the service there has been great.
So in conclusion, I write all this not so much with the intent that you’ll like which magazines I like (because that would be stupid), but simply because I like talking about them. I’ve often said that if I could do my education over again (or for a second time?), I’d get a degree in journalism, intern for a magazine somewhere, and would pursue a career at a fashion publication. Because yes, I love doing makeup (and fashion, which we refrain from fully discussing here), and I love playing with makeup, but I really love talking about it more than anything. And that’s what magazines are for, right? xo, MR
P.S. A quick word about advertisements: I’ve sometimes heard folks complain about how many advertisements there are in magazines (especially the larger ones, like Elle and Vogue). Do you know why those ads are there? It’s not simply page-filler that the editors have chosen to scatter on every other page to annoy you. Magazines are actually paid by all varieties of companies to have their advertisements placed in them. This is a large portion of a publication’s profit (and customer subscriptions and newsstands sales are actually a lesser portion). So, a thick issue full of advertisements is actually thee sign that a magazine is doing quite well. When you see all those Chanel, Revlon, H. Stern, and Vince Camuto advertisements and you keep having to flip your way through like a maniac to get to the meat, just know that they are a big reason why the magazine in your hand is circulating in the first place.
I agree with your assessment of glamour and especially cosmopolitan. I ceased my subscription for that very reason. Their editors assume that all women are nymphomaniacs. I would prefer beauty/fashion magazines to focus simply on that–beauty and fashion– steer clear of sex, politics and religion. However, I would welcome articles on the virtues and advantages of abstaining from sex and the importance of working on one’s self esteem, self respect and inner beauty. This would invariably educate and empower our needy, insecure and often self absorbed subscribers who often find themselves putting their self esteem in the hands of total strangers and tools. Ok let me get off my soap box. Thank you for the informative and nicely written post. Cheers.